Search Results
6/26/2025, 3:49:21 PM
>>508785149
>actually that's counterproductive. Inflation devalues money, and generates larger numbers, with larger numbers you need to spent more large numbers to reach the same %.
Not true at all if the private sector "borrowing" slows down or has already slowed or been slowing down and the government will "borrow" to finance the military spending. And/or if there is a slump in private sector spending and thus a greater percentage of GDP (which is just the amount of fiat currency transacted in a year) is from government spending.
Of course there is no such thing as "borrowing" from banks. "Borrowing" from banks is just giving banks the opportunity to create more fictional fiat currency. They don't even bother to physically print or mint the fiat currency anymore.
>actually that's counterproductive. Inflation devalues money, and generates larger numbers, with larger numbers you need to spent more large numbers to reach the same %.
Not true at all if the private sector "borrowing" slows down or has already slowed or been slowing down and the government will "borrow" to finance the military spending. And/or if there is a slump in private sector spending and thus a greater percentage of GDP (which is just the amount of fiat currency transacted in a year) is from government spending.
Of course there is no such thing as "borrowing" from banks. "Borrowing" from banks is just giving banks the opportunity to create more fictional fiat currency. They don't even bother to physically print or mint the fiat currency anymore.
Page 1