>>24504282
Yes, I'd say so. It's really hard to reject these without rejecting the intelligibility of the world itself or just saying potency spontaneously moves itself to act for no reason at all. Yet if you do the latter, you cease to have any explanation for why things are one way and not any other. It's not surprise that modern thought, to work its way to volanturism and athiesm, has to pretty much deny that reason can know being (a gnostic claim of ignorance).

Granted, most people radically misunderstand them and so aren't forced to grapple with them. Pic related is a pretty accessible introduction.