Search Results
6/30/2025, 4:53:57 PM
>>507517749
> WEST CAN’T HELP UKRAINE WIN THE WAR — BUT IT COULD HELP END IT
> As Western leaders continue to insist they’ll support Ukraine “for as long as it takes,” the question now is, to what end?
> a hard truth is becoming even harder to ignore: Military victory may no longer be a realistic objective for Kyiv — no matter how many billions the West sends, or how many Russian soldiers die.
Ukrainian soldiers, of course, are not known to die. Please ignore the press-ganging and the acres of fresh graves.
> This isn’t a popular outlook in Washington or Brussels, where the assumption persists that enough aid and resolve will eventually break Moscow. But despite Ukraine’s extraordinary resilience and the West’s deep pockets, that outcome is looking increasingly unlikely.
> the war is hardening into a grinding stalemate — one that threatens to exhaust Ukraine, fracture Western unity and empower the very regime it was meant to weaken. This doesn’t mean Ukraine should surrender, nor does it mean abandoning Western support. It does, however, demand an honest reckoning: There is no pathway to total Ukrainian victory — and pretending otherwise is no substitute for strategy.
> On paper, the West is still backing Ukraine robustly. The latest $61 billion U.S. aid package passed after months of political gridlock. European countries are slowly scaling up defense production; and NATO continues to signal resolve.
> Ukraine faces a demographic cliff. the economy has suffered a severe contraction from the war. Russia, meanwhile, has adapted. Its economy is now on a war footing; its defense industry is outproducing the West in artillery shells; and its military — though inefficient and brutal — maintains the advantage in manpower and strategic depth.
kek brutal Russia chads, how dare you.
https://archive.md/1Kw12
> WEST CAN’T HELP UKRAINE WIN THE WAR — BUT IT COULD HELP END IT
> As Western leaders continue to insist they’ll support Ukraine “for as long as it takes,” the question now is, to what end?
> a hard truth is becoming even harder to ignore: Military victory may no longer be a realistic objective for Kyiv — no matter how many billions the West sends, or how many Russian soldiers die.
Ukrainian soldiers, of course, are not known to die. Please ignore the press-ganging and the acres of fresh graves.
> This isn’t a popular outlook in Washington or Brussels, where the assumption persists that enough aid and resolve will eventually break Moscow. But despite Ukraine’s extraordinary resilience and the West’s deep pockets, that outcome is looking increasingly unlikely.
> the war is hardening into a grinding stalemate — one that threatens to exhaust Ukraine, fracture Western unity and empower the very regime it was meant to weaken. This doesn’t mean Ukraine should surrender, nor does it mean abandoning Western support. It does, however, demand an honest reckoning: There is no pathway to total Ukrainian victory — and pretending otherwise is no substitute for strategy.
> On paper, the West is still backing Ukraine robustly. The latest $61 billion U.S. aid package passed after months of political gridlock. European countries are slowly scaling up defense production; and NATO continues to signal resolve.
> Ukraine faces a demographic cliff. the economy has suffered a severe contraction from the war. Russia, meanwhile, has adapted. Its economy is now on a war footing; its defense industry is outproducing the West in artillery shells; and its military — though inefficient and brutal — maintains the advantage in manpower and strategic depth.
kek brutal Russia chads, how dare you.
https://archive.md/1Kw12
Page 1