>>17843235
>No, the underreporting of CSA is only really common in the specific instance of boys being raped by women
The vast majority of adult-child sex is not reported to police. You have not provided any evidence to substantiate your claim that the majority of adult-child sex comes to the attention of the police. This study shows that only 12% of childhood rapes were ever reported to police: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10391513/

Presumably, voluntary sexual contacts, and less severe sexual contacts, are less likely to be reported.

>therefore it is not a separate variable you can control for
It is a separate variable which can be controlled for and studies which account for it find it is far more predictive of harm than "CSA" status. See the studies in pic rel.

>I assumed you were discussing skew, but as indicated in your next excerpt you do not seem to understand that skew and confounding are entirely different concepts.
You are the one that does not understand the difference between skew and confounding. Controlling for skew in data does not address confounding. You brought up skew when reminded of the need to control for confounders.

>>17843238
>Here they account for "consent"
You only posted an excerpt of a study which I can not investigate.

>here they acknowledge and account for the "confounding"
This isn't even a study. You aren't even reading these. You're just spamming random links you find on Google. Do better.

>>17843242
He isn't even reading the links he's spamming.

>>17843263
>The majority of the sample was African American (56.6%)
>Nearly two-thirds of the sample (60.7%, n = 51) reported the perpetrator of the CSA was a relative
This is a study on groids that were the victims of incest that sought help from psychiatrists. Antis are just getting lazier and lazier.