>>510416927
by driving high-IQ males into creating artificial wombs
>>510416979
sounds like you're thinking of a product, not a tech
it would be like saying so about electricity, or the microchip, the ramifications are too wide and deep to say those things are "good" or "bad", and ultimately doesn't matter, because it's going to happen either way
>>510417063
obviously, nothing is certain
if you disagree I have no problem with it, I'm presenting my case based on things we have today
I'm not wishful-thinking anything, this is all based on that I'm seeing right now, and a very sober prediction of what's to come if things keep progressing at the same speed