>>7619461
>>7619463
>You lack talent. Many such cases.
/thread
Drawfags really don't know how the real world works, in football, soccer if you're an Ameriburguer, you can spot talent when they're less than 10 y/o and by 15 they're signed to big teams in Europe, anyone else is gonna be a mediocre soccer player or not make it at all.
Hard work just helps them reach their talent ceiling, and the harder they work faster they reach it but there's still a ceiling.
No amount of hardwork will turn an average dude in the next Lebron, Ali, Ronaldo, Messi, Mbappé, Neymar, Gojo or Sukuna.
In music, most piano teachers worth shit know right away when a kid is talented and they're gonna make it big even when they're 5.
Someone good with computers generally learn to code when they're still a teen, and most IT pros knew code before they even joined college, they're just there for an useless piece of paper not so much for skills.
Guess what? most art pros are good since they're kids, just read their biographies or even wikipedia, it's all there, they're talented from birth, some are nepobabies that learned to draw with their mommy.
I feel bad for /ic/ fags that think that reading Loomis will solve their lack of talent, survivorship bias much? Just give up already OP.