Search Results
7/13/2025, 6:05:07 PM
>>4447023
I have owned and used most of Fuji's primes. The AF is much better than the older, but only marginally better than the f2s, which are also lm and quite quick already. Picrel is an example IQ wise from the old to new.
The 18 f1.4 and 23 f1.4 WR definitely are in the territory that I don't miss good FF glass when using them. The 33 f1.4 isn't quite there wide open, but is still very good once stopped down. I'd put the 90 f2 and 30 f2.8 macro also in the "don't miss good FF" tier of IQ (but the 30 sucks otherwise). Everything else has just been "good enough" or comparable to mid-low range FF glass.
I'm also one of the posters selling their T5, but I'm still keeping 3 other Fuji bodies and the 23 f1.4 WR and 90 f2 are keepers for sure. I'm getting rid of most the other X-mount glass like the 18 and 33 and replacing with the new Sigma 17-40.
I have owned and used most of Fuji's primes. The AF is much better than the older, but only marginally better than the f2s, which are also lm and quite quick already. Picrel is an example IQ wise from the old to new.
The 18 f1.4 and 23 f1.4 WR definitely are in the territory that I don't miss good FF glass when using them. The 33 f1.4 isn't quite there wide open, but is still very good once stopped down. I'd put the 90 f2 and 30 f2.8 macro also in the "don't miss good FF" tier of IQ (but the 30 sucks otherwise). Everything else has just been "good enough" or comparable to mid-low range FF glass.
I'm also one of the posters selling their T5, but I'm still keeping 3 other Fuji bodies and the 23 f1.4 WR and 90 f2 are keepers for sure. I'm getting rid of most the other X-mount glass like the 18 and 33 and replacing with the new Sigma 17-40.
Page 1