>>105966357
>Can someone perma-ban this pedo schizo faggot already? I'm sick and tired of seeing these derailment posts every time a pedo is exposed.

You've been trying for 20 years.
You'll have to use a bullet.
And I'll kill you dead right back, Christian "millstoneanator".

YHWH allows child brides.
Also I was here before you: this is not your site no matter what you think.

>>510515001
>This country has gone down the fucking drain. I mean seriously. I don't even recognize it anymore. Pre 9/11 America was the last semblance of what I consider to be real America. Now its a parody of itself and every press conference is like an episode of the twilight zone.

America was invented so men could go in the woods with their loli 7 yr old brides.
Then you New Testament worshipers ruined it 170 years ago.

>>105922141
>>>105922136 (You)
>you will never be terry davis buddy, get a job

I was on the net before terry, dipshit.
And was making 3d maps and releasing them before you ever knew who he was.

>>105900521
>Why was a dude getting charged for crimes he did as aminor decades ago?
>I thought statue of limitations or whatever would stop that

White christians and feminists got rid of the statute of limitations for crimes against women and children recently.
They do not care about the ex-post-facto rule and will claim it only applies to federal law.

They feel that America, and all governments and countries exist to protect women and women's children. And to harness men as beasts of the field to be yoked to the woman and serve her as a "husband" (caretaker).
They believe that ba'al is a demon. Ba'al is the word used for men in the old testament: it means master or lord. Whites and Christians feel men are demons to be harnessed and controlled: and that YHWH was their head deamon. Defeated by Jesus the morning star.

Their god: Jesus' millstone never rests.
Their religion tells them men should have their genitals cut off (matthe 19, greek).
While they dance on the grave of YHWH and his pro-child bride law (which they claim has been abrogated by Jesus, and the word "New Testament" itself (Testament means "deal"): they say "We are in the New Testament").

If you like young girls you have to kill these people.
For they are wiping you out world wide for their god Jesus Christ.

Jesus sits on the throne of heaven, with the whore mary magdaline at his side in power,
While YHWH has been consigned to Hell.
According to christians today.

>>105896637
>and kid diddlers cannot just leave me the fuck alone
You came to them. RMS was always a loli lover.
Get the fuck out.

I notice you don't mention feminists: the original white conservative faggots that invaded our hobby in 2007: then came the trannies.

Pedos were always here, dipshit.
>"The nominee is quoted as saying that if the choice of a sexual partner were protected by the Constitution, "prostitution, adultery, necrophilia, bestiality, possession of child pornography, and even incest and pedophilia" also would be. He is probably mistaken, legally--but that is unfortunate. All of these acts should be legal as long as no one is coerced. They are illegal only because of prejudice and narrowmindedness."
>
>RMS on June 28th, 2003 https://stallman.org/archives/2003-mar-jun.html
>
>--------------------------
>
>"I am skeptical of the claim that voluntarily pedophilia harms children. The arguments that it causes harm seem to be based on cases which aren't voluntary, which are then stretched by parents who are horrified by the idea that their little baby is maturing. "
>
>RMS on June 5th, 2006) https://stallman.org/archives/2006-mar-jun.html#05%20June%202006%20(Dutch%20paedophiles%20form%20political%20party
>
>--------------------------
>
>" There is little evidence to justify the widespread assumption that willing participation in pedophilia hurts children.
>
>Granted, children may not dare say no to an older relative, or may not realize they could say no; in that case, even if they do not overtly object, the relationship may still feel imposed to them. That's not willing participation, it's imposed participation, a different issue. "
>
>RMS on Jan 4th, 2013) https://stallman.org/archives/2013-jan-apr.html#04_January_2013_(Pedophilia

>>105896637
>and kid diddlers cannot just leave me the fuck alone
You came to them. RMS was always a loli lover.
Get the fuck out.

I notice you don't mention feminists: the original white conservative faggots that invaded our hobby in 2007: then came the trannies.

Pedos were always here, dipshit.
>"The nominee is quoted as saying that if the choice of a sexual partner were protected by the Constitution, "prostitution, adultery, necrophilia, bestiality, possession of child pornography, and even incest and pedophilia" also would be. He is probably mistaken, legally--but that is unfortunate. All of these acts should be legal as long as no one is coerced. They are illegal only because of prejudice and narrowmindedness."
>
>RMS on June 28th, 2003 https://stallman.org/archives/2003-mar-jun.html
>
>--------------------------
>
>"I am skeptical of the claim that voluntarily pedophilia harms children. The arguments that it causes harm seem to be based on cases which aren't voluntary, which are then stretched by parents who are horrified by the idea that their little baby is maturing. "
>
>RMS on June 5th, 2006) https://stallman.org/archives/2006-mar-jun.html#05%20June%202006%20(Dutch%20paedophiles%20form%20political%20party
>
>--------------------------
>
>" There is little evidence to justify the widespread assumption that willing participation in pedophilia hurts children.
>
>Granted, children may not dare say no to an older relative, or may not realize they could say no; in that case, even if they do not overtly object, the relationship may still feel imposed to them. That's not willing participation, it's imposed participation, a different issue. "
>
>RMS on Jan 4th, 2013) https://stallman.org/archives/2013-jan-apr.html#04_January_2013_(Pedophilia

>>105889212
>why are you afraid of someone bringing attention to the FOSS community's pedophile problem?

RMS is a paedophile.
Why do you want us to betray him?

>"The nominee is quoted as saying that if the choice of a sexual partner were protected by the Constitution, "prostitution, adultery, necrophilia, bestiality, possession of child pornography, and even incest and pedophilia" also would be. He is probably mistaken, legally--but that is unfortunate. All of these acts should be legal as long as no one is coerced. They are illegal only because of prejudice and narrowmindedness."
>
>RMS on June 28th, 2003 https://stallman.org/archives/2003-mar-jun.html
>
>--------------------------
>
>"I am skeptical of the claim that voluntarily pedophilia harms children. The arguments that it causes harm seem to be based on cases which aren't voluntary, which are then stretched by parents who are horrified by the idea that their little baby is maturing. "
>
>RMS on June 5th, 2006) https://stallman.org/archives/2006-mar-jun.html#05%20June%202006%20(Dutch%20paedophiles%20form%20political%20party
>
>--------------------------
>
>" There is little evidence to justify the widespread assumption that willing participation in pedophilia hurts children.
>
>Granted, children may not dare say no to an older relative, or may not realize they could say no; in that case, even if they do not overtly object, the relationship may still feel imposed to them. That's not willing participation, it's imposed participation, a different issue. "
>
>RMS on Jan 4th, 2013) https://stallman.org/archives/2013-jan-apr.html#04_January_2013_(Pedophilia

>>509820386
>White Christians hate men so much that revealing that the male of their species had intercourse with the girl of their spieces will cause the hive self destruct.

Fuck you then.

>>105834683
You can change a man against his will.
But he will be of the same opinion still.
>"The nominee is quoted as saying that if the choice of a sexual partner were protected by the Constitution, "prostitution, adultery, necrophilia, bestiality, possession of child pornography, and even incest and pedophilia" also would be. He is probably mistaken, legally--but that is unfortunate. All of these acts should be legal as long as no one is coerced. They are illegal only because of prejudice and narrowmindedness."
>
>RMS on June 28th, 2003 https://stallman.org/archives/2003-mar-jun.html
>
>--------------------------
>
>"I am skeptical of the claim that voluntarily pedophilia harms children. The arguments that it causes harm seem to be based on cases which aren't voluntary, which are then stretched by parents who are horrified by the idea that their little baby is maturing. "
>
>RMS on June 5th, 2006) https://stallman.org/archives/2006-mar-jun.html#05%20June%202006%20(Dutch%20paedophiles%20form%20political%20party
>
>--------------------------
>
>" There is little evidence to justify the widespread assumption that willing participation in pedophilia hurts children.
>
>Granted, children may not dare say no to an older relative, or may not realize they could say no; in that case, even if they do not overtly object, the relationship may still feel imposed to them. That's not willing participation, it's imposed participation, a different issue. "
>
>RMS on Jan 4th, 2013) https://stallman.org/archives/2013-jan-apr.html#04_January_2013_(Pedophilia