Search Results
7/24/2025, 7:55:47 PM
>>716328610
Alright sit down anons, even if you get alternative payment processor in the states, this is still unfortunately the problem.
Yes I'm quoting >>>null here he might be a huge faggot but he's not incorrect.
>For the law to have value, it needs to do the following:
>First, it must create a federal civil relief with statutory damages for lost opportunity, ideally with riders for punitive damages, and also attorney's costs and fees. As this is a purely financial matter, it must make financial sense to sue one of the largest and most powerful companies in the world.
>Second, it must undo existing requirements already imposed by the federal government on financial services. Title III of the PATRIOT Act "deputized" (in the words of Ron Paul) the financial services to act as a form of law enforcement, one which cannot be appealed and provides no due process. By the time the PATRIOT Act was not renewed, the vestigial remains of these Title III requirements had been reshuffled into other parts of the U.S.C.
So lets say you get your alternatives to VISA, and Mastercard in the states. Well... How are you ensuring they aren't going act as a form of law enforcement in the same manner this current duo-poly currently is? You want BOTH the alternatives of other payment processors AND every provision of that faggot ass PATRIOT Act to be repealed including the shit that wormed its way into the code of law. Having other nations with their own payment processors would also help.
I know Pirate Nation, and Chibi skim this site for easy views for Twatter, so if they're both reading this, you better let nigs know that the problem is far more deep rooted than it seems on the surface.
Alright sit down anons, even if you get alternative payment processor in the states, this is still unfortunately the problem.
Yes I'm quoting >>>null here he might be a huge faggot but he's not incorrect.
>For the law to have value, it needs to do the following:
>First, it must create a federal civil relief with statutory damages for lost opportunity, ideally with riders for punitive damages, and also attorney's costs and fees. As this is a purely financial matter, it must make financial sense to sue one of the largest and most powerful companies in the world.
>Second, it must undo existing requirements already imposed by the federal government on financial services. Title III of the PATRIOT Act "deputized" (in the words of Ron Paul) the financial services to act as a form of law enforcement, one which cannot be appealed and provides no due process. By the time the PATRIOT Act was not renewed, the vestigial remains of these Title III requirements had been reshuffled into other parts of the U.S.C.
So lets say you get your alternatives to VISA, and Mastercard in the states. Well... How are you ensuring they aren't going act as a form of law enforcement in the same manner this current duo-poly currently is? You want BOTH the alternatives of other payment processors AND every provision of that faggot ass PATRIOT Act to be repealed including the shit that wormed its way into the code of law. Having other nations with their own payment processors would also help.
I know Pirate Nation, and Chibi skim this site for easy views for Twatter, so if they're both reading this, you better let nigs know that the problem is far more deep rooted than it seems on the surface.
Page 1