>>17866849
>but talks about operations of the named Persons
Yes and people here are denying they are one and the same just so Jesus doesn't impregnate his own mother.
>Trinity as a term is a relatively late concept, the truth of the Trinity - God the Father, Jesus Christ and the Holy Ghost being God has been believed by Christians from the beginning.
Nobody is talking about the term, who the fuck cares what you call it? The problem is the very same people that read those verses early on did not believe in a triune being that's coeternal and coequal. You think those heretical groups did not read the same verses as you? Of course they did, what happened was just a political victory.
>>17866861
>He never "lost the immortality" he just died
Are you listening to yourself? To be immortal means to not experience death. the Son experienced death so he lost his immortality. It's an essential attribute of God that Jesus just did not posses
>why do you keep continuing to argue that Jesus was actually God in his full power
Because that's what your tradition teaches. He's fully God and fully man