>>935977859
>>935977859
I think my issue is that I just slapped a pixel into my regular Illustrious workflow.
Normally, I gen at a small res, then upscale w/ nearest-exact, but then I do three more Sampling passes at a low denoise. I think it's the three extra passes that fucks it up, tbh, I should just upscale and leave it there w/o any more passes.