>>280886665
Are you one of the retards who downloaded the AI interpolated 60 fps version?

also there wont be a password on the servers unless the servers start getting real cramped

>>530868181
>first post is an automated message from steam staff
That was not an automated message, not by a long shot. It's literally signed by a real person. You're a fucking dumbass.
That was a bot hoster manually contacting support to ask for the ban to be lifted and he got that message back a day later. None of that was automated.
>from a refund
Yeah, you're an illiterate retard. That's not even close to the same thing. Refunds are automated because you're not contacting a real person. Contacting support to lift a ban has to go by a real person because surprise, no one gets automatically unbanned! That would be as retarded as you are!
>originally introduced
>originally
Right before:
>Game developers inform Valve when a disruptive player has been detected in their game, and Valve applies the game ban to the account. The game developer is solely responsible for the decision to apply a game ban. Valve only enforces the game ban as instructed by the game developer.
None of that implies an automatic process at all.

Let me explain this in terms your dumb ass can understand
>None of the bot hosters got VAC banned. This means that VAC was not updated, nor were the bans automatic.
>All of the bot hosters got community bans which are only ever handed out manually. (see above)
>At the same time, not all the bot hosters got hit, many were bragging about not being banned yet (discord screenshots)
>This means that it was NOT an automated detection algorithm
>The bots were being manually deleted not right away but some time after via Steam reports (2nd screenshot)
>This means a janny was manually deleting the accounts
If you still don't get it then there's no helping you.