the entities who harass me are desperately attached to the false belief that doubling-down on projection of misconceptions somehow constitute a disproof of hypothesis, which contrasts the conversationally-trivial but useless observation that any solution is morally imperfect while dismissing aphorism that « perfect is the enemy of good », and exploiting my autistic straightforwardness and empathetic desire to discuss actual altruistic interventions in constructive open-ended explorative manners. contrary to what the perpetrators have been echoing, none of the proposals i’ve introduced constitute exclusive pro-active or immediate suggestions of coercive action. the conflation of extrinsic highly-repetitive, unapologetically-dismissive and verbose fallacies with intrinsic intellectual rigor is intellectually and morally self-suppressing. if peace treaties were trivial, they would have already happened. a tangible solution can not be derived from fantastical non-platonic space or some grandiose illusive pretense of unachievable moral magnificence that narcissistic gurus trickle around.

the game they play evidently exploits the lack of situational and archival awareness of potential lurkers for a hypocritical pretense of moral virtues, while they laugh at the difficulties of neurodivergent entities in every other events, while having never shown any legitimate interests in neither effective altruism nor technological accelerationism. thus they desperately have a thirst for imaginary «gotchas» to obfuscate the inherent unwarranted hostility against non-verbal autists like me, unprincipled from love for actual victims of conflicts and diverting the real and immediate harm they cause with the noise of approximative inappropriately-distant and elusive metaethics of subvert dilemmas. eventually, attacking the intrinsic first-order or higher-order reflective ethical values of perspectives to expose them to mob aggression is exactly the essence of anti-morality.