>>509982330
>Muh jews love him!
You might want to rethink that one.

>Yes, and that also applies to Trump and Epstein.
At this point you're not even trying to have a coherent argument. You're literally answering the idea that Israel doesn't want to draw attention to itself with "but Epstein!"

>Read your own article:
And? There's literally nothing in there that states he's a criminal. All you're doing is stating that they had networking. That's how white-collar operates.
Meanwhile you had to scroll past this part:
>Asked about Epstein's relationship with Trump he replied: "The only thing I can say about President Trump is that he is the only person who in 2009, when I served a lot of subpoenas on a lot of people, or at least gave notice to some pretty connected people that I wanted to talk to them, he is the only person who picked up the phone and said 'lets just talk, I'll give you as much time as you want, I'll tell you what you need to know.'
...To get to that.
You're deliberately ignoring that he was one of the few people whom helped get Epstein arrested in the first place, even though there was absolutely no fallout to any of the other celebrities that denied help. All of this to try to misrepresent their networking. That's not even a bad argument, that's deliberate malice on your part.

>inb4 but muh praise
If he meant it, he wouldn't have helped get the guy arrested.

>As I said, not a word on what she said about Trump.
No, just them trying to draw connection to her claims and status as an Epstein victim to MAGA. They don't want to outright state "Trump is a pedo" because they don't want to be responsible for libel. They want to breadcrumb their readers to that trail.

>I don't even know what you're trying to say
Then reading the post instead of trying to eat your monitor.

>minting Jewish power
With this postulate, one question: is the media pro or anti-Trump?