>>11331984
i just had the thought that i didn't test any of this without periods and, it's like 99.9% the same
the tiniest details changed
my thought process outside of that, was to try and denote who was male and who was "female" here with stuff like:
male penetrated, clothed female naked male,
and later:
1boy, nude, small penis,

i think having this as the whole first line of tags:
futa on male,duo,anal sex,male penetrated,clothed female naked male.,
gave it decent enough foundation to actually do it correctly but it's a house of cards and trying to build on it much at all started to cause the entire thing to fall apart and all i ended up with shortly afterwards was submissive futa in one way or another

no loras at all, just 1 quality embedding at the end
pic is literally >>11331991 without any periods