>>511031618
every time they try to "eat the rich" everyone just ends up literally eating the poor

>>509774247
and yet somehow all you commies, rich and poor alike, always end up literally eating the poor

>>509746716
because royal authority comes from the loyalty of his subjects more than the king's own life
only by slaughtering the entire royal family, even the dogs, can you make the generals, advisers, and all the other assorted staffing truly abandon all hope of restoring the monarchy, no matter how good or how awful the new king turns out to be

>>509312067
communism is when you say you'll eat the rich, but end up literally eating the poor instead

>>509036088
everyone votes for eating the rich, but always ends up literally eating the poor instead

>>508809191
like all communist dictators, he is the perfect little populist exemplar of each and every individual voter, right up until he gets power
them he starts literally eating the poor, and all his fellow commissars start doing the same, and even daring to complain about it gets you added to the buffet table