Search Results
ID: /2RyoPOt/pol/508464375#508476938
6/23/2025, 7:11:46 PM
>>508476533
You keep obsessing over verb tenses like that magically changes the fact that the world doesn’t bow. “Should bow” doesn’t mean it is happening—it means it’s being called for. You’re just hiding behind technical grammar to avoid the obvious: if Christ’s kingship were fully realized, people would bow. That’s what kingship means—enforced recognition, not “well technically he’s king in heaven but you can ignore him here and nothing happens.”
The verse tells you what should happen because it isn’t happening. That’s the whole point. If it were a present reality, there’d be no need to say it. But instead of facing that, you’re clinging to wordplay like a legalist having a meltdown in a theology thread. It’s not a real kingdom if it has no presence, no power, and no consequences. And the fact that you’re screeching over a single word instead of defending how your king runs anything at all just proves the throne is empty and you know it.
You keep obsessing over verb tenses like that magically changes the fact that the world doesn’t bow. “Should bow” doesn’t mean it is happening—it means it’s being called for. You’re just hiding behind technical grammar to avoid the obvious: if Christ’s kingship were fully realized, people would bow. That’s what kingship means—enforced recognition, not “well technically he’s king in heaven but you can ignore him here and nothing happens.”
The verse tells you what should happen because it isn’t happening. That’s the whole point. If it were a present reality, there’d be no need to say it. But instead of facing that, you’re clinging to wordplay like a legalist having a meltdown in a theology thread. It’s not a real kingdom if it has no presence, no power, and no consequences. And the fact that you’re screeching over a single word instead of defending how your king runs anything at all just proves the throne is empty and you know it.
6/23/2025, 7:11:46 PM
>>22857223
You keep obsessing over verb tenses like that magically changes the fact that the world doesn’t bow. “Should bow” doesn’t mean it is happening—it means it’s being called for. You’re just hiding behind technical grammar to avoid the obvious: if Christ’s kingship were fully realized, people would bow. That’s what kingship means—enforced recognition, not “well technically he’s king in heaven but you can ignore him here and nothing happens.”
The verse tells you what should happen because it isn’t happening. That’s the whole point. If it were a present reality, there’d be no need to say it. But instead of facing that, you’re clinging to wordplay like a legalist having a meltdown in a theology thread. It’s not a real kingdom if it has no presence, no power, and no consequences. And the fact that you’re screeching over a single word instead of defending how your king runs anything at all just proves the throne is empty and you know it.
You keep obsessing over verb tenses like that magically changes the fact that the world doesn’t bow. “Should bow” doesn’t mean it is happening—it means it’s being called for. You’re just hiding behind technical grammar to avoid the obvious: if Christ’s kingship were fully realized, people would bow. That’s what kingship means—enforced recognition, not “well technically he’s king in heaven but you can ignore him here and nothing happens.”
The verse tells you what should happen because it isn’t happening. That’s the whole point. If it were a present reality, there’d be no need to say it. But instead of facing that, you’re clinging to wordplay like a legalist having a meltdown in a theology thread. It’s not a real kingdom if it has no presence, no power, and no consequences. And the fact that you’re screeching over a single word instead of defending how your king runs anything at all just proves the throne is empty and you know it.
Page 1