>>534202125
I added the ubishill due to recent posts like >>534201570, or anons saying they're skipping the collab characters and "they" say to dilate

The 'quirkycharacterschizo' isnt referring to the actual schizo, but "they" have expressed some dislike for the bland/generic conventionally attractive girls before.

Also, to all the posters responding to me with actual replies, the point of the post is to show how far gone you all are. Its specifically to call out this collective culmination of aspects to be lumped together to create this boogeyman phenomena (I even did it with the 'dilate' thing to demonstrate earlier in the post).

I find it very hard to understand how a single word (dilate) warps the conscious to the degree that its association is linked and outright avoided, since if it's used it, would indicate that (You) are 'le schizo'.

I have seen specific posts refer to "them" being associated the SEA region and having limited vocabulary, but is it really even the extent of that original poster anymore or is it just a collective/accepted projection of this entity since it's easier to dismiss?

If "their" vocabulary is so limited and easy to recognize, it would also be easy to recreate and would be used to push for/against any certain regardless of intent.
>For example, If some anon were to say they want less/more collabs (since that gate has been opened), depending on my stance on this, I could simply reply with 'dilate' to the post to push for/against that narrative, and since /1999/ already associates the word 'dilate' with the "picklesschizo" and dispises "them", then I would simply shape how certain views are interpreted by the collective.

That in my opinion, is a very slippery slope and requires more nuance that the avg. /1999/ poster cares to give.

Regards,
א