Search Results
7/24/2025, 8:31:43 PM
Honestly, this is what ticks me off. I dont care if you are into men, older men, young men. What ticks me off is my intelligence being insulted.
You guys expect me to think you are unhappy because you dont have bf. But you arent. You are unhappy because it takes effort.
Because every day you are here talking about it, but you arent doing anything about it. You like talking about it. But you are considerably, demonstrably less moved to do anything about it. And thats like calling me a fucking idiot in the coyest way.
This is something a relative taught me. They would insist they had a problem and would complain about it constantly. So I, being a rational yet compassionate dolt, would start rattling off a dozen solutions to their problem.
And they would shut them all down. After a while, I realized they were enjoying it. Thats what they actually wanted, someone to listen to them tell me why they couldnt do what they wanted. That was the easier, bigger emotional reward.
Meaning, their "problem" was actually the solution. It solved them not having to make any uncomfortable efforts or step out of their comfort zone or try or do anything new. By claiming it was a problem, they were free to do what they really wanted, which was complain.
But that wasnt the worse part. It wasnt me they were trying to convince. They had convinced themselves. Meaning they convinced themselves that rational solutions, simple ones even, were somehow impossible. And when you deny rationality, it means you are departing reason and, by extension, sanity. It means you are driving yourself nuts...
You guys expect me to think you are unhappy because you dont have bf. But you arent. You are unhappy because it takes effort.
Because every day you are here talking about it, but you arent doing anything about it. You like talking about it. But you are considerably, demonstrably less moved to do anything about it. And thats like calling me a fucking idiot in the coyest way.
This is something a relative taught me. They would insist they had a problem and would complain about it constantly. So I, being a rational yet compassionate dolt, would start rattling off a dozen solutions to their problem.
And they would shut them all down. After a while, I realized they were enjoying it. Thats what they actually wanted, someone to listen to them tell me why they couldnt do what they wanted. That was the easier, bigger emotional reward.
Meaning, their "problem" was actually the solution. It solved them not having to make any uncomfortable efforts or step out of their comfort zone or try or do anything new. By claiming it was a problem, they were free to do what they really wanted, which was complain.
But that wasnt the worse part. It wasnt me they were trying to convince. They had convinced themselves. Meaning they convinced themselves that rational solutions, simple ones even, were somehow impossible. And when you deny rationality, it means you are departing reason and, by extension, sanity. It means you are driving yourself nuts...
7/19/2025, 10:50:17 AM
I will explain women again. Its more important that straight men understand this, so consider this a freebie.
The "Y" chromosome contains a small segment that during a stage of embryonic development, becomes relevant and codes for the production of androgens that begin sorting the raw material of the embryo; its presence inhibits the formation of female reproductive organs. Theres more to it, but you get the point and probably know much of that already.
However the female is not just reproductive organs; it takes an enormous amount of metabolic resource strain to maintain and survive pregnancy. This is how sexually dimorphic animals achieve this, especially in humans, where the survivability of the female has to be ensured by males, because a pregnant human female cannot possibly find food or defend itself; the child and mother would be lost and the species would stop there.
And it is because they are so physically diminished by this restructuring of the body away from independent survivability that males find them easy to overwhelm and mate with.
So far this seems intuitive, but most people dont think it through, or if they do, they dont say so because its not flattering.
Moreover, because males already have a strength advantage, they can select for the easiest sex targets. That would be the smallest. And yes, that means youngest. So women look and act childish because they have been selected that way. Those who appear young longer will have a longer opportunity to mate.
But this has consequences. For one, you cant have youthful physiology on the outside. This means the brain development is altered also. Moreover, that lack of reasoning ability is precisely what makes them irrational enough to want a juvenile child-parent relationship with a stronger male rather than try to be independent, and we can see what happens when females attempt independence...
The "Y" chromosome contains a small segment that during a stage of embryonic development, becomes relevant and codes for the production of androgens that begin sorting the raw material of the embryo; its presence inhibits the formation of female reproductive organs. Theres more to it, but you get the point and probably know much of that already.
However the female is not just reproductive organs; it takes an enormous amount of metabolic resource strain to maintain and survive pregnancy. This is how sexually dimorphic animals achieve this, especially in humans, where the survivability of the female has to be ensured by males, because a pregnant human female cannot possibly find food or defend itself; the child and mother would be lost and the species would stop there.
And it is because they are so physically diminished by this restructuring of the body away from independent survivability that males find them easy to overwhelm and mate with.
So far this seems intuitive, but most people dont think it through, or if they do, they dont say so because its not flattering.
Moreover, because males already have a strength advantage, they can select for the easiest sex targets. That would be the smallest. And yes, that means youngest. So women look and act childish because they have been selected that way. Those who appear young longer will have a longer opportunity to mate.
But this has consequences. For one, you cant have youthful physiology on the outside. This means the brain development is altered also. Moreover, that lack of reasoning ability is precisely what makes them irrational enough to want a juvenile child-parent relationship with a stronger male rather than try to be independent, and we can see what happens when females attempt independence...
7/5/2025, 4:12:54 PM
7/4/2025, 3:41:35 PM
A transexual must invade non trans spaces as it evolves.
In the beginning of its illness, it will cling tightly, fiercely to its own in order to pattern its thoughts after the collective narrative and learn various methods of imitating the thing that it is not.
However it will reach a point where it feels it no longer has anything to learn and grows weary of the talking points that never change. It will feel self realized and its instincts will remind it that there was a point to all this from the beginning: to seek the attention and approval from those who would give it to the thing they are imitating. Now that the camouflage is complete, it is time to apply the mimicry to get results. At which point it deploys into non trans spaces to harvest that attention.
If it remained in trans space, it would grow bored, even disgusted, as these were not the people it intended to impress, and it sees its own weakness and fraud among its peers and becomes repulsed. It slowly pieces together how obvious the lies are and does not wish to be confronted with it daily.
Now it has a choice based on whether it can pass: If it passes, it will claim the reward it sought all along, sex with cis men. The sex drive, after all, is what propelled this venture and why it was so persistent. If it does not pass, it will be detected, in which case it still receives attention, but instead focuses on discussion to hold the attention of cis men, with the strategy of believing that if it can convince cis men that it is somehow actually a female in some meta realm through repetition, seeking desperate men that need some rationale, they can still get the reward...
In the beginning of its illness, it will cling tightly, fiercely to its own in order to pattern its thoughts after the collective narrative and learn various methods of imitating the thing that it is not.
However it will reach a point where it feels it no longer has anything to learn and grows weary of the talking points that never change. It will feel self realized and its instincts will remind it that there was a point to all this from the beginning: to seek the attention and approval from those who would give it to the thing they are imitating. Now that the camouflage is complete, it is time to apply the mimicry to get results. At which point it deploys into non trans spaces to harvest that attention.
If it remained in trans space, it would grow bored, even disgusted, as these were not the people it intended to impress, and it sees its own weakness and fraud among its peers and becomes repulsed. It slowly pieces together how obvious the lies are and does not wish to be confronted with it daily.
Now it has a choice based on whether it can pass: If it passes, it will claim the reward it sought all along, sex with cis men. The sex drive, after all, is what propelled this venture and why it was so persistent. If it does not pass, it will be detected, in which case it still receives attention, but instead focuses on discussion to hold the attention of cis men, with the strategy of believing that if it can convince cis men that it is somehow actually a female in some meta realm through repetition, seeking desperate men that need some rationale, they can still get the reward...
6/28/2025, 6:34:47 PM
So I asked myself, if gays believe thinking and talking about sex and dicks as much as they do is completely normal, then when does it become abnormal. Like, how much is too much.
Its one of those contradictions about you people I either can't resolve, or if I do, its not flattering. For example, if we agree a man my age gabbling about sex is, at a minimum, distasteful, then do gay homosexuals simply not grasp they will age.
And theres the contradiction. Gays seem to insist obsession with sex is normal, but then have no concept of their own future, which is to imply that this sort of thinking has to come to an end at some point. There has to be a point which you realize you have to change, or mature. Or some would say 'grow up'.
But you show no self awareness of this.
So an alternative explanation is that no, actually, its not normal, that men are expected to mature. And if they are expected to mature, then when?
Because when I read these threads, everyone seems to agree that decrepit 40 year old men sound gross when discussing sex. And yet this thread always reads like tomorrows creepers in training.
To be fair, its not all of you. Many of you seem to have been mentally fucked by the last generation to confuse love and sex and think there is not the possibility, but the high likelihood and- in my opinion, more dangerous- expectation that this plan is going to lead somewhere.
And yet you also seem to intuit that gay is better suited to youth as a simple vice or diversion, as you constantly mourn lost opportunities, as you describe it, in your earlier years.
So this is the part where you say 'boomer, youre full of shit and self loathing and dont know what youre talking about", to which I say fine. Lets assume thats true.
Then wtf is the alternative explanation.
The tldr is that a lot of you act like the disgusting creepers you rightfully loathe while simultaneously becoming those very people, like you have no concept of time passing.
Its one of those contradictions about you people I either can't resolve, or if I do, its not flattering. For example, if we agree a man my age gabbling about sex is, at a minimum, distasteful, then do gay homosexuals simply not grasp they will age.
And theres the contradiction. Gays seem to insist obsession with sex is normal, but then have no concept of their own future, which is to imply that this sort of thinking has to come to an end at some point. There has to be a point which you realize you have to change, or mature. Or some would say 'grow up'.
But you show no self awareness of this.
So an alternative explanation is that no, actually, its not normal, that men are expected to mature. And if they are expected to mature, then when?
Because when I read these threads, everyone seems to agree that decrepit 40 year old men sound gross when discussing sex. And yet this thread always reads like tomorrows creepers in training.
To be fair, its not all of you. Many of you seem to have been mentally fucked by the last generation to confuse love and sex and think there is not the possibility, but the high likelihood and- in my opinion, more dangerous- expectation that this plan is going to lead somewhere.
And yet you also seem to intuit that gay is better suited to youth as a simple vice or diversion, as you constantly mourn lost opportunities, as you describe it, in your earlier years.
So this is the part where you say 'boomer, youre full of shit and self loathing and dont know what youre talking about", to which I say fine. Lets assume thats true.
Then wtf is the alternative explanation.
The tldr is that a lot of you act like the disgusting creepers you rightfully loathe while simultaneously becoming those very people, like you have no concept of time passing.
Page 1