>>533676616
>chernobyl
no. it was still within safe parameters, it was some unknown reaction and an issue with that kinda generator type they had no idea about which led to the fuckup. go read up on it
>waste
spread at that altitude it wouldn't rain down on one area to the point of causing real damage. it'd just kill birds and force people to take anti rads in a wide area for a week. And that'd still require retarded mismanagement, realistically if you encased the barrels in concrete or some shit it'd be fine.