Search Results
7/23/2025, 8:32:10 PM
>>16732088
>chat GPT every single time you are losing an argument?
slop gpt is the perfect sophist, all plausible and unsubstantial statements. Especially when it can't address points. -LIKE APPLYING THE SAME CRITERIA TO EACH VIDEO FRAME EVEN WHEN IT GOES AGAINST YOUR HYPOTHESIS-
Tell me, did you use it ? :^).
>Changes direction without inertia-like curves
Meaningless when the estimation of movements is based on a incorrect assumption only applied in a inconsistent manner.
>Splits into two synchronized targets that track in formation
Again, you're assuming that you know well the object using a post-processed measurement restricted to a representation (image). Tell me why the objects also dissapears or changes of shape for 1-2 frames...
>No thermal plume or diffusion from water entry
>An object disappearing into the ocean and continuing its trajectory underwater
I don't have argue against your flawed conclusions.
>Recombines in a way that is smooth and preserved by the gimbal tracking
That things are unrelated, and the video "UFO" is someone trying to manually track the object using the x-y control (an error***), there's no lock-on at all of the auto-tracker, vidrel shows an object being tracked by an equivalent system. Always on the center before losing lock on.
>expect consistent relative velocity between two targets,
You only know the speeds of the aircraft and the ground spot of the camera, you and that "researcher" have no idea of the real movements of the object because neither of you did your photogrammetry properly.
>chat GPT every single time you are losing an argument?
slop gpt is the perfect sophist, all plausible and unsubstantial statements. Especially when it can't address points. -LIKE APPLYING THE SAME CRITERIA TO EACH VIDEO FRAME EVEN WHEN IT GOES AGAINST YOUR HYPOTHESIS-
Tell me, did you use it ? :^).
>Changes direction without inertia-like curves
Meaningless when the estimation of movements is based on a incorrect assumption only applied in a inconsistent manner.
>Splits into two synchronized targets that track in formation
Again, you're assuming that you know well the object using a post-processed measurement restricted to a representation (image). Tell me why the objects also dissapears or changes of shape for 1-2 frames...
>No thermal plume or diffusion from water entry
>An object disappearing into the ocean and continuing its trajectory underwater
I don't have argue against your flawed conclusions.
>Recombines in a way that is smooth and preserved by the gimbal tracking
That things are unrelated, and the video "UFO" is someone trying to manually track the object using the x-y control (an error***), there's no lock-on at all of the auto-tracker, vidrel shows an object being tracked by an equivalent system. Always on the center before losing lock on.
>expect consistent relative velocity between two targets,
You only know the speeds of the aircraft and the ground spot of the camera, you and that "researcher" have no idea of the real movements of the object because neither of you did your photogrammetry properly.
Page 1