>>5930096
Why does every non-european/marxist(jew) talk like this?
They always try to degrade europe and it's countries saying that there were others better at that time.
When talking about corded ware and yamnaya they always say that hitites(also PIE) and mesopotamians were better. Even at the point of saying that yamnyaya-derived cultures weren't even proper civilizations, even though england was the vessel that started the bronze age.
When talking about european dark ages they always say that "ahh when mediterranean countries were at it's lowest, arabs were superior!" Ignoring moor pirates and even going as far as say that spaniards nowadays all have moorish DNA because of a millitary occupation.
Even when they united and defended themselves under one banner they portray them as savages (the crusades as an example).
They always reduce history to a minimum and take only the parts that fit in their narrative that "europe wasn't that good to begin with", literally every modern law, philosophy and technological advance is directly caused by europeans, and there were tons of other civilizations and tribes and religions which define europe.
If people like being proud of their heritage and using that as motivation for honoring their ancestors and building even better lifes for their kin so be it.
Also note that it's always "was, was, was" but never "is, is, is" india maybe was rich in wealth, nowadays it's a shithole, and the people inhabiting it are retards, rich castes come to europe so their sons don't have to shit in the street, and they form ghettos because they are retards.
Let europe be for europeans.