>>534764041
What's the difference between a cybermancer and a tinkerer? I feel like two tech based classes would be too same-y, like there's no other demon summoning class that clashes with warlock or second necromancer class to clash with dk. Blizzard is run by mouth breathers, they can't do nuanced class fantasies only general ideas.
The lava thing is cool though, fire mage is so bleh, I want a fire magic class based off of dark iron dwarf enemies from cataclysm. Plenty of fire based lore to pull from. One spec could be a tank based on volcanos and eruptions and shiet. Sounds cool, they'd never do it.
Merchant class is awesome, thug gangster is just rogue, charisma class wouldn't work in gameplay, knives expert is cool but enough to warrant a class but maybe a 4th rogue spec, evil pally is way too vague, psychic class would be cool but I can't imagine the specs nor what lore thing it would be based on without stepping on shadow priest's toes, and bard is gay as hell.
Anyway, my two cents for some classes would be a continuation of your knife class as a performer class. Dps spec would be knife juggler, tank spec would be a ringmaster (getting audience's attention and manipulating enemies like circus animals), and healer spec would be a carnie (various circus amusements + acrobatics.) The lore for performer would be darkmoon shit I guess. Another one would be maybe a witch or cultist class, something with darker tones like warlock or dk but focusing on other lore stuff. Witch specs would all be dps: drustvar spec, alchemy/potion spec, and blood magic spec. Cultist class would be old god shit: yogg spec (tank, tentacles and psychic powers), c'thun spec (support, qiraji minions and buffs), n'zoth spec (dps, more void shit since blizz writers are obsessed with it).