Search Results
6/27/2025, 9:50:57 PM
>>508895966
>but they don't force ethnic change
They basically do since they state that you shouldn't distinguish based on them, so if some African decides he's Christian and wants to move into your Christian but also White country, the motivation to say "no" can't come from your faith, and your faith pressures you to say "yes". Since we've seen it's inevitable that some African will convert to Christianity (often because a Christian missionary showed up and begged him to convert) this means that the lack of racial consciousness which is baked into Christianity will certainly result in "ethnic change" over time.
>Um why don't you talk about Islam though?!?!
Islam is mostly followed by Arabs and various other non-Whites whose thoughts on religion do not concern me.
And also no, neither Christianity nor Islam are straight enemies of Judaism/Zionism because they derive their religion from Judaism. The reason they're called the "Abraham Accords" is because all three religions trace themselves back to Abraham and the pact he made with the voices in his head to be king of the world; they just disagree about who exactly will be the king of the world.
Islam famously allows "people of the book" to live unconverted on Muslim lands. And while Christians have variously pogrom'd and expelled Jews at various points, those Jews always got let back into wherever they'd been expelled from and have also variously gotten special privileges and access in European society. Even today, the main reasons Israel exists have to do with British Israelism (the fever dream that Whites wuz Jews) and the Scofield Bible, which only worked because the Bible ties Christians irrevocably to Jewish history and Jews themselves. To call this a strictly adversarial relationship is to miss at least half the story. The best you can say is that Christians have a complex relationship with their Jewish elders, which is a far step from saying they're strict and consistent enemies. They're not.
>but they don't force ethnic change
They basically do since they state that you shouldn't distinguish based on them, so if some African decides he's Christian and wants to move into your Christian but also White country, the motivation to say "no" can't come from your faith, and your faith pressures you to say "yes". Since we've seen it's inevitable that some African will convert to Christianity (often because a Christian missionary showed up and begged him to convert) this means that the lack of racial consciousness which is baked into Christianity will certainly result in "ethnic change" over time.
>Um why don't you talk about Islam though?!?!
Islam is mostly followed by Arabs and various other non-Whites whose thoughts on religion do not concern me.
And also no, neither Christianity nor Islam are straight enemies of Judaism/Zionism because they derive their religion from Judaism. The reason they're called the "Abraham Accords" is because all three religions trace themselves back to Abraham and the pact he made with the voices in his head to be king of the world; they just disagree about who exactly will be the king of the world.
Islam famously allows "people of the book" to live unconverted on Muslim lands. And while Christians have variously pogrom'd and expelled Jews at various points, those Jews always got let back into wherever they'd been expelled from and have also variously gotten special privileges and access in European society. Even today, the main reasons Israel exists have to do with British Israelism (the fever dream that Whites wuz Jews) and the Scofield Bible, which only worked because the Bible ties Christians irrevocably to Jewish history and Jews themselves. To call this a strictly adversarial relationship is to miss at least half the story. The best you can say is that Christians have a complex relationship with their Jewish elders, which is a far step from saying they're strict and consistent enemies. They're not.
Page 1