Search Results
6/30/2025, 1:31:36 AM
>>24505485
>>24505563
>Iconoclastic philosopher of political philosophy, men's issues, social & cultural psychology and revisionist intellectual history, musician (occasional guitarist and knob twiddler) and fan of traditional & extreme metal, hardcore, punk, post-punk, post-hardcore/emo, stoner & psychedelic rock, classic rock, baroque & classical music, electronica, dark ambient, harsh noise, grunge/noise rock, folk, jazz, progressive rock and industrial/EBM music.
This you? Hope you don't take this the wrong way, btu this doesn't feel very impressive content-wise. Plus, it's easy to get self-published anon. I await the day when one of you /lit/ folks actually has the drive and determination to get published by Oxford or Cambridge or one of those top university presses. Anyone can get their junk self-published.
>>24505323
I haven't read it just a quick glance through the pdf. You at least aren't as bad as the usual /lit/ fare. I still feel underwhelmed. My advice for you is to take a few more years immersing yourself in the latest philosophical research literature on subjects you find interesting like ethics, philosophy of AI, and stuff related to what you call "recognition." Check out some work on dialogical relation (like Buber's I-Thou) or care ethics. Even Fichtean ethics might be relevant. I don't think you say anything very profound so far. The bits I can track are promising for something like an undergraduate philosophy student, provided you can progress along the lines of further original research and high criteria of self-criticism in a few years. The rest I can't judge but it doesn't look like it's doing much more than taking on the trappings of formalese (the pseudo-mathematical stuff) or mystical-sounding words and divisions (the pseudo-Chinese/Christian stuff). Be wary of that stuff. You remind me of the sort of work I was writing eleven years ago. Take my advice seriously and apply yourself and you may have a promising future. If you don't, well, maybe you'll get a following among pseuds but that's a really unfortunate abortive way to end. It's in your hands. Just don't let /lit/ sway you in their pseud directions.
>>24505563
>Iconoclastic philosopher of political philosophy, men's issues, social & cultural psychology and revisionist intellectual history, musician (occasional guitarist and knob twiddler) and fan of traditional & extreme metal, hardcore, punk, post-punk, post-hardcore/emo, stoner & psychedelic rock, classic rock, baroque & classical music, electronica, dark ambient, harsh noise, grunge/noise rock, folk, jazz, progressive rock and industrial/EBM music.
This you? Hope you don't take this the wrong way, btu this doesn't feel very impressive content-wise. Plus, it's easy to get self-published anon. I await the day when one of you /lit/ folks actually has the drive and determination to get published by Oxford or Cambridge or one of those top university presses. Anyone can get their junk self-published.
>>24505323
I haven't read it just a quick glance through the pdf. You at least aren't as bad as the usual /lit/ fare. I still feel underwhelmed. My advice for you is to take a few more years immersing yourself in the latest philosophical research literature on subjects you find interesting like ethics, philosophy of AI, and stuff related to what you call "recognition." Check out some work on dialogical relation (like Buber's I-Thou) or care ethics. Even Fichtean ethics might be relevant. I don't think you say anything very profound so far. The bits I can track are promising for something like an undergraduate philosophy student, provided you can progress along the lines of further original research and high criteria of self-criticism in a few years. The rest I can't judge but it doesn't look like it's doing much more than taking on the trappings of formalese (the pseudo-mathematical stuff) or mystical-sounding words and divisions (the pseudo-Chinese/Christian stuff). Be wary of that stuff. You remind me of the sort of work I was writing eleven years ago. Take my advice seriously and apply yourself and you may have a promising future. If you don't, well, maybe you'll get a following among pseuds but that's a really unfortunate abortive way to end. It's in your hands. Just don't let /lit/ sway you in their pseud directions.
Page 1