Search Results
7/12/2025, 3:30:17 AM
>>63971044
>as though they were lightly armored.
I didn't say that but compared to a T-72 (or a lighter T-62) it has dogshit protection as a T-72 could frontally resist a 105mm shell compared to only 30mm for a Booker.
Plus the fucking thing is huge as well.
>as though they were lightly armored.
I didn't say that but compared to a T-72 (or a lighter T-62) it has dogshit protection as a T-72 could frontally resist a 105mm shell compared to only 30mm for a Booker.
Plus the fucking thing is huge as well.
Page 1