Search Results
6/30/2025, 7:51:50 PM
>>24507157
>similar idioms spread across large bodies of work may just as well be coincidence.
Given the extent of the parallels with North's idiom and the ideas and the idiom and ideas of the canon, the claim that this is a coincidence is simply not plausible. The mathematical odds against this are inconceivably huge.
This kind of forensic linguistic evidence holds up in court (see the Unabomber) and any competent expert witness would easily demonstrate in a trial that the same author wrote the North and Shakespeare texts.
>similar idioms spread across large bodies of work may just as well be coincidence.
Given the extent of the parallels with North's idiom and the ideas and the idiom and ideas of the canon, the claim that this is a coincidence is simply not plausible. The mathematical odds against this are inconceivably huge.
This kind of forensic linguistic evidence holds up in court (see the Unabomber) and any competent expert witness would easily demonstrate in a trial that the same author wrote the North and Shakespeare texts.
Page 1