>>935799784
>he killed democrats
Yeah, because they sided with Republicans. You insist that Thomas Crooks was a Republican even though he tried to kill Trump. Trump is a Republican, is he not? So why would your logical fallacy apply in only one case but not the other? That said, there's much more evidence that this guy was a Leftist than there is that Crooks was Right-wing. In the case of Crooks literally the only evidence you got is that he registered as one, but many Democrats did that just to be able to vote against Trump in the primaries. Registering as Republican means absolutely nothing in determining what someone's sincere deeply held beliefs are. That guy who did that also donated money to ActBlue and tried to fucking murder Trump. The weight of evidence is that he was a Leftist. And you can say the same with this guy. He had "no kings" papers like the other anon mentioned. He was assmad at those politicians he killed because they sided with Republicans on something, and he was appointed by Tim Walz, the Democrat governor of Minnesota and Kamala's running mate in the 2024 election. All this evidence points to him being a Democrat. Oh, but he registered as a Republican? Again, as with Crooks this doesn't mean anything. Maybe he did it to vote against Trump in the primaries, like so many other Leftists did. Picrel. Also, did you ever heard of the concept of a "false flag"? If you're going to do some heinous act, its not a bad idea to try to smear the blame for it on someone you don't like. Since this guy doesn't like Republicans he is happy to have you believe that he is one so that it makes them look bad. It seem like you'd fallen for it just like he hoped you would.