Search Results

Found 2 results for "fb5a946c8e3b2f178c2c99ae22545d5f" across all boards searching md5.

Anonymous /g/105628745#105628745
6/18/2025, 9:39:31 AM
Let’s cut the crap: C++ is a goddamn mess, and Rust is here to bury it once and for all. There's no point in pretending that C++ is some sacred systems language when it’s really just a bloated Frankenstein of decades-old cruft, half-assed “modern” features, and a standard library so badly over-engineered it feels like self-harm to use. Its verbosity is a joke, its memory safety is non-existent, and every new revision just duct-tapes more crap on top of the dumpster fire. Rust? Rust solves the problems C++ spent years shoving under the rug. Ownership, lifetimes, fearless concurrency, Rust gives you all the power without the footguns. And every time C++ tries to play catch-up, it vomits out some convoluted, unsafe, and half-baked version of what Rust already nailed. Hell, modern C++ isn’t even that fast anymore - with all the “smart” abstractions and templated garbage, its performance is barely any better than Java or C#, and often worse in real-world scenarios. Rust doesn’t just outperform it.. it obliterates it, with cleaner code, fewer bugs, and a compiler that actually gives a damn. The future doesn’t belong to C++ and its mountain of technical debt. It belongs to Rust, a language leaner, meaner, and ready to burn the old jank to the ground.
Anonymous /g/105616043#105616043
6/17/2025, 2:12:21 AM
It is inevitable, Rust is poised to obliterate C++ as the systems programming language of choice, and the writing is already carved into the silicon. C++ has become a grotesque relic of committee-driven bloat, drowning in its own incoherent patchwork of legacy syntax, undefined behavior, and bolted-on features that pretend to be “modern”. The so-called “modern” C++ standard library is a monument to verbosity and inefficiency, riddled with leaky abstractions, footguns, and template metaprogramming monstrosities that make even seasoned engineers weep. Memory safety? Rust bakes it into the type system. Zero-cost abstractions? Rust doesn’t just promise them.. it enforces them with rigor. Every new “feature” C++ adopts is a pale, twisted shadow of something Rust already did better, cleaner, and with compile-time guarantees. C++ isn’t even fast anymore - modern compilers wade through layers of STL and virtual dispatch hell to produce binaries that barely edge out managed runtimes like C# or JVM-based languages. Meanwhile, Rust compiles to lean, predictable machine code, driven by fearless concurrency and ownership semantics that make segfaults and data races relics of a less enlightened age. The age of Rust is not coming... it has already begun, and C++ is staggering, bloated and broken, into irrelevance.