Search Results
6/21/2025, 8:14:26 AM
>>17780442
>Based on these facts, what can we conclude about the recent digital reconstruction of the Mycenaean woman? Does it provide new insights into the past? Unfortunately, it does not. Rather, something closer to the reverse is true. Pre-existing insights into the past are what guided this reconstruction.
>Furthermore, as we have seen, this reconstruction does not follow what the average Mycenaean woman would have looked like. Why the digital artist decided to use a rare example of a fair-haired, blond-eyed Minoan woman from Santorini is a mystery.
>There is nothing about the woman from Grave Circle B in Mycenae that suggests that she had anything other than a normal Mycenaean appearance. As such, it would surely have made more sense to follow the standard depiction of women in Mycenaean (and Minoan, for that matter) artwork.
>While the pale skin may be correct, dark eyes and black hair might have been a more accurate choice. It is also notable that the digital reconstruction does not depict her as having a Mycenaean hairstyle. This is particularly strange, since the clay reconstruction created by Manchester University did give her an accurate hairstyle.
Neck yourself fag. This is not science. It's sensationalist tabloid we wuzery. And of course xitter nordicists are swallowing it up and using it to we wuz Greek elites as snowniggers.
>Based on these facts, what can we conclude about the recent digital reconstruction of the Mycenaean woman? Does it provide new insights into the past? Unfortunately, it does not. Rather, something closer to the reverse is true. Pre-existing insights into the past are what guided this reconstruction.
>Furthermore, as we have seen, this reconstruction does not follow what the average Mycenaean woman would have looked like. Why the digital artist decided to use a rare example of a fair-haired, blond-eyed Minoan woman from Santorini is a mystery.
>There is nothing about the woman from Grave Circle B in Mycenae that suggests that she had anything other than a normal Mycenaean appearance. As such, it would surely have made more sense to follow the standard depiction of women in Mycenaean (and Minoan, for that matter) artwork.
>While the pale skin may be correct, dark eyes and black hair might have been a more accurate choice. It is also notable that the digital reconstruction does not depict her as having a Mycenaean hairstyle. This is particularly strange, since the clay reconstruction created by Manchester University did give her an accurate hairstyle.
Neck yourself fag. This is not science. It's sensationalist tabloid we wuzery. And of course xitter nordicists are swallowing it up and using it to we wuz Greek elites as snowniggers.
Page 1