Search Results
6/20/2025, 9:47:02 AM
Foreign Affairs, a globohomo regime linked journal, has a new article on ending the war in Ukraine
https://www.foreignaffairs.com/ukraine/close-natos-door-ukraine
>Kyiv should concentrate on convincing Washington and other partners to keep the arms coming and make the most of the multiple bilateral security pacts that emerged from negotiations on the margins of NATO’s 2023 summit. Ukraine should also expedite its accession to the EU, a process that would speed up economic and political reforms and ultimately give the country at least a version of the security guarantee it seeks; Article 42.7 of the Treaty on European Union is a mutual defense clause. Moscow has indicated that it can live with Ukraine’s integration into the EU, which it sees as a more benign economic and political bloc, not a military alliance.
>The proposal that has emerged from Trump’s diplomatic efforts is sound: a cease-fire, with Russia holding on to the roughly 20 percent of Ukrainian territory that it currently occupies. But that deal is acceptable only if the remaining 80 percent of Ukraine emerges as a sovereign, secure, and prosperous democracy. Arriving at that outcome will require that NATO provide Ukraine the military capability, training, and intelligence needed to block further Russian advances, enabling Kyiv to make it clear to Putin that he has already conquered as much of Ukraine as he is going to get. Ukraine is unlikely to give up on restoring its territorial integrity. But that goal should be pursued at the negotiating table with a post-Putin Russia, not on the battlefield. For now, Kyiv should focus on securing a durable cease-fire and turning a free Ukraine into a success story.
More of this "Armed Neutrality" bollocks that was advocated by the Council on Foreign Relations think tank yesterday.
The collective west seems to be pushing this Neutrality in name only were Ukraine remains armed by the west and in bilateral and EU security relationships with NATO countries.
https://www.foreignaffairs.com/ukraine/close-natos-door-ukraine
>Kyiv should concentrate on convincing Washington and other partners to keep the arms coming and make the most of the multiple bilateral security pacts that emerged from negotiations on the margins of NATO’s 2023 summit. Ukraine should also expedite its accession to the EU, a process that would speed up economic and political reforms and ultimately give the country at least a version of the security guarantee it seeks; Article 42.7 of the Treaty on European Union is a mutual defense clause. Moscow has indicated that it can live with Ukraine’s integration into the EU, which it sees as a more benign economic and political bloc, not a military alliance.
>The proposal that has emerged from Trump’s diplomatic efforts is sound: a cease-fire, with Russia holding on to the roughly 20 percent of Ukrainian territory that it currently occupies. But that deal is acceptable only if the remaining 80 percent of Ukraine emerges as a sovereign, secure, and prosperous democracy. Arriving at that outcome will require that NATO provide Ukraine the military capability, training, and intelligence needed to block further Russian advances, enabling Kyiv to make it clear to Putin that he has already conquered as much of Ukraine as he is going to get. Ukraine is unlikely to give up on restoring its territorial integrity. But that goal should be pursued at the negotiating table with a post-Putin Russia, not on the battlefield. For now, Kyiv should focus on securing a durable cease-fire and turning a free Ukraine into a success story.
More of this "Armed Neutrality" bollocks that was advocated by the Council on Foreign Relations think tank yesterday.
The collective west seems to be pushing this Neutrality in name only were Ukraine remains armed by the west and in bilateral and EU security relationships with NATO countries.
Page 1