>>508363914
I still reject the notion.

Sure. That’s valid. But your lens is focused too wide.
You’re asking, “Can AI topple the state?”
I’m saying, “Can it bleed the state dry one data breach at a time?”
Very different outcomes. Very different metrics.

Petitions don’t work. Voting flops. Pressure doesn’t matter.

Agreed—to a point. But pressure is cumulative, not instant.
The Soviet Union didn’t collapse because one guy filed a complaint.
It collapsed because millions did, for decades, while the contradictions piled up until reality imploded the narrative.

AI amplifies contradictions and democratizes insight.
That doesn’t overthrow power.
It exhausts it.

AI will empower governments, not the people.

Yes—and.
The gun empowers the soldier.
But it also empowers the insurgent.
It’s not the tool that dictates outcome—it’s the wielder’s intent, access, and resolve.

You’re right that AI makes tyrants stronger.
But it also makes lone wolves, whistleblowers, autists, and victims of maladministration more dangerous than ever before.

Power won’t shift by idealism.
It’ll shift when it becomes more expensive to maintain the lie than to relinquish control.

And AI cuts the cost of truth to zero.

That’s why they’re scared of it.