Search Results
7/25/2025, 10:31:46 AM
>>106012209
We already know the arguments. People have been making them since OOP was first proposed half a century ago. No one needs to watch a two hour flat earth video to be able to say flat earthers are mentally ill. No one needs to watch a two hour anti-OOP video to know what the anti-OOP points are as they've been all over the place for decades.
Your attempt at sealioning failed and you ended up looking disingenuous, which further erodes your credibility, lessening the possibility of anyone giving a shit about your whiny obsession.
We already know the arguments. People have been making them since OOP was first proposed half a century ago. No one needs to watch a two hour flat earth video to be able to say flat earthers are mentally ill. No one needs to watch a two hour anti-OOP video to know what the anti-OOP points are as they've been all over the place for decades.
Your attempt at sealioning failed and you ended up looking disingenuous, which further erodes your credibility, lessening the possibility of anyone giving a shit about your whiny obsession.
7/21/2025, 5:38:23 AM
>>105974147
It's a form of sealioning. They produce something time consuming, claim it makes their case rock solid, and you are unqualified to have an opinion unless you waste a large amount of time on their low information density presentation.
There are succinct arguments against OOP that have been around almost as long as OOP has been. They've been considered and some have found other paradigms a better fit for their development process, while most are content with OOP.
It's a good idea for anyone who is serious about software development to read up on the arguments against OOP and then decide for themselves. No need to listen to someone whine on for hours about the psychological damage it does to his ego that not everyone does things the same way he does.
It's a form of sealioning. They produce something time consuming, claim it makes their case rock solid, and you are unqualified to have an opinion unless you waste a large amount of time on their low information density presentation.
There are succinct arguments against OOP that have been around almost as long as OOP has been. They've been considered and some have found other paradigms a better fit for their development process, while most are content with OOP.
It's a good idea for anyone who is serious about software development to read up on the arguments against OOP and then decide for themselves. No need to listen to someone whine on for hours about the psychological damage it does to his ego that not everyone does things the same way he does.
Page 1