Search Results
7/1/2025, 11:12:36 PM
>>33302124
Marriage is a special case.
You marry a woman becuase you love her and you do what is best for her by making her good, not becuase she fulfils your (sexual desires).
Post marital sex for the purpose of procreation is not sinful, if you just have sex with her becuase you feel horny, you are a sexual degenerate and you married her for the purpose of restricting her freedom so you can exploit her more.
Marriage is a special case.
You marry a woman becuase you love her and you do what is best for her by making her good, not becuase she fulfils your (sexual desires).
Post marital sex for the purpose of procreation is not sinful, if you just have sex with her becuase you feel horny, you are a sexual degenerate and you married her for the purpose of restricting her freedom so you can exploit her more.
6/13/2025, 6:09:20 PM
>>17761275
Monotheism and the belief in 1 deity can be logically deduced, if you constrain this definbition to a being that is all powerful and all benevolent, it comes out as God. Simply said, nothing would impede this being since if it could, it would be even more powerful. (The ontological argument and free will defense cover the details here).
Miracles itself are a bad a rgument from your side, since they are a reason people are faithful, they believe in them. People arguing deny religion but say that they'd be convinced if a miracle was percieved by them, so why would i in that case just say that you're dellusional if you've percieved it?
As for archeological evidence, the book of Genesis emphasizes spiritual truths above literal interpritations, even though some might say it's fully true, they could also mean it as God subsiding on another plane of reality different to us. Even so if you ask a fundamentalist, they would tell you about the area which it was set in (Mesopotamia) being flooded and destroyed in the last glacial maximum.
Monotheism and the belief in 1 deity can be logically deduced, if you constrain this definbition to a being that is all powerful and all benevolent, it comes out as God. Simply said, nothing would impede this being since if it could, it would be even more powerful. (The ontological argument and free will defense cover the details here).
Miracles itself are a bad a rgument from your side, since they are a reason people are faithful, they believe in them. People arguing deny religion but say that they'd be convinced if a miracle was percieved by them, so why would i in that case just say that you're dellusional if you've percieved it?
As for archeological evidence, the book of Genesis emphasizes spiritual truths above literal interpritations, even though some might say it's fully true, they could also mean it as God subsiding on another plane of reality different to us. Even so if you ask a fundamentalist, they would tell you about the area which it was set in (Mesopotamia) being flooded and destroyed in the last glacial maximum.
Page 1