Search Results
8/10/2025, 12:51:23 PM
>>534673935
If we are streamlining text, you can squeeze more out of this using existing precedent
>also for the rest of this turn after this card resolves, you cannot Special Summon, except Beast monsters.
into
>also you cannot Special Summon non-Beasts this turn.
"this turn" usage from Primite Lordly Lode's lock, which is ruled as being a "for the rest of this turn" style lock whilst taking up minimal space (and not deemed a problem since its BLMM reprint features no changes)
Pluralization of types is something that has precedent, and the existence of the Type mention implies Monster anyway, so you can shorten things that way too. This part is so intuitive that I genuinely do not understand why Konami doesn't use Type mentions this way. Honestly now that I think about it, most mentions of "Monster" could be dropped from the game without much information loss.
If we are streamlining text, you can squeeze more out of this using existing precedent
>also for the rest of this turn after this card resolves, you cannot Special Summon, except Beast monsters.
into
>also you cannot Special Summon non-Beasts this turn.
"this turn" usage from Primite Lordly Lode's lock, which is ruled as being a "for the rest of this turn" style lock whilst taking up minimal space (and not deemed a problem since its BLMM reprint features no changes)
Pluralization of types is something that has precedent, and the existence of the Type mention implies Monster anyway, so you can shorten things that way too. This part is so intuitive that I genuinely do not understand why Konami doesn't use Type mentions this way. Honestly now that I think about it, most mentions of "Monster" could be dropped from the game without much information loss.
Page 1