>>509886200
>Oooh, you're still here. Have you realised your error of judgement in disagreeing with me on my statements?
No. Your theories are juvenile. Your definitions are non-existent. Your logic is incoherent. You decry commodity based money as unworkable, despite the fact that it has worked splendidly for most of human history. Widespread use of pure fiat is a relatively recent phenomena of the last 100 years.

Every.
Single.
Time.
Fiat money is used, it results in the same pattern of economic disaster. Debts, deficit and finally collapse, and people like you then say:
>Look what capitalism did!

>>509802808
Is my favorite economist white?