>>24566256
>I'm "seething" about the fact that someone is using the label "psychology" to spread mysticism
Mysticism more or less is the direct, personal experience and interaction with the divine, which directly folds in one's psyche and subsequent psychological forces in how one perceives such an interaction and how such an interaction in turn impacts the psyche and its forces. Ergo, psychology and mysticism are very closely related elements, and if mysticism is paranormal in the sense of being outside the bounds of scientific, experimental inquiry, then really thats its own fault and shortcoming, because frankly, not everything in existence can be "vexed" to give up its secrets much as Bacon necessitated when he laid out his method of natural philosophy aka science.

Also, Jung directly engages in alchemy and astrology in his book Synchronicity to try to provide a grounded study on the topic. He isnt a coward or a pussy, you simply haven't read him beyond Man and His Symbols, which is why you didn't lay out which if his books you've read earlier when the other anons demanded that of you, which you then started a public internet tantrum over.