>>60666232
>discussing 'the team' on first name basis
>wild discussions about drama among first name basis (former) team members who 'hold different opinions'
>"if only john was still in charge!!!"
>"mike did x and that's why everything is down!!!"

I think you nailed a great point here. That discussing the "team" on a first-name-basis, it's like a form of tribalism.
I used to trade mining stocks, and at first I was purely trading the charts and fundamentals and I was doing great.
But after I had held some poorly performing stocks for a while, I started getting into stock forums where people created "generals" for the bags I was holding. I started getting into arguments about the "team" and getting emotionally invested in the "vision" and the "roadmap" and hanging on every update and press release.
Eventually I had a moment of clarity and realised I was married to my bags.
I stopped reading the forums, stopped giving a fuck about the team and the vision or any of their updates.
And I dumped those poorly performing assets, and went back to trading on chart action and fundamentals.
I grew up and took the loss, removed emotion, and went back to being a/successful trader
(instead of a tribe/cult member true believer bag holder)
I see this tribalism over and over again and I also see charismatic team leaders taking advantage of it, for personal profit

>>60579656
The $13 stablecoin. Rock solid and unshakable