>>512085111
> Povkrovsk soon to be declared as strategically unimportant?

The claims get increasingly wilder and less believable as things get more dire
>inb4 14:1

>>511319439
The pattern goes:

>actually we have *them* surrounced
>enemy meat waves, 10:1 casualties
>enemy is out of ammunition
>we still hold 20% of *territory*
>we still hold 10% of *territory*
>no strategic importance
>we never wanted it anyway