>>106592506
>what's wrong with abusing poorly managed system of a giant corpo?
I'm simplifying of course, but society only works if we uphold the social contract. You are breaking that social contract to gain an advantage, which you hope will be minor enough of an infraction that noone will punish you for it.
In game theory, there's a reason tit-for-tat is the way most societies developed - societal cooperation doesn't work without it. I simply believe that what you're doing is wrong and if you aren't punished for it it erodes societal norms, hence I want you to be punished for it.
>But muh giant corpo
Putting the fact that the company being comparatively large to the damage done aside, it doesn't change if it's wrong or not wrong. If I shit in your food a smaller amount, it's still bad.
Even within your framework the justification doesn't work though, because you're not hurting aliexpress, they're just reducing that money from the seller, so that seller is who you're hurting. A lot of sellers on ali are neither rich nor part of larger companies, unless you specifically target large well established stores.

I'm not gonna issue a fatwa against you for it, but I do think you're a degenerate for it. The same logic leads to people stealing in public places, leaving trash etc. It's subhuman behavior.