>>4465951
>Equivalence doesnt include ISO either.
Correct. Exactly why I didnt say it did.
>>4465959
>wahhh your sensor size doesn't matter
Didn't say that. I hit the word limit so I didn't go into detail on that subject.
>gfx bad
Are you projecting or something?

I'm starting to have serious concerns about the level of reading comprehension some of you have.