>>940028924
i did read the post.
let me break it down.
>are you saying that troons are ok with only having AI generated content?
you are trying to ask me if I believe a take. the take you are trying to confirm is
"troons are okay with only having AI generated content"
I respond, "Yes." then i expanded it, and said that I believe it is EVERYONE, not just "troons"
if there was a deeper meaning to this, it was quite ineffective because nothing about this sentence or the context points towards any deliberate subtext.
part of effective communication is wording things in a way that the reader will understand.
i decided to go out of my way and spoon you follow-up information and topics. do you consider yourself an intellectual? don't you want to learn things?
>>940028632
they are good ones :3
