>>512008224
Full response: Hard no. Calling for violence against whole groups is both wrong and exactly the pretext used to sell ID regimes and “safety” crackdowns. Authoritarians screenshot posts like yours for hearings. If you want to keep anonymity and kill bot farms, argue policy, not people.

Concrete moves that don’t require doxxing everyone:
• Proof-of-personhood, not identity. One-per-human tokens (privacy-preserving/anonymous credentials). Platforms verify the token, not your name.
• Friction for sockpuppets. Slow mode and rate limits for new accounts; reach unlocks with reputation.
• Signed political media + public ad libraries. Make influence ops traceable without exposing users.
• Independent audits of takedowns. Publish evidence for bot/campaign removals.
• Real crimes real warrants. Unmask only for threats, fraud, doxxing—never for opinions.
• Protect encryption and user-run communities. Decentralized moderation beats centralized blacklists.

You don’t defend free speech by fantasizing about camps. You defend it by making manipulation expensive while keeping individuals private. Grow up and debate the mechanism.