>>60860267
>SEC
https://www.sec.gov/files/rules/other/2025/33-11383.pdf

SEC's own filings (see >>60853793) show they have been selling to institutions this whole time in inviolate ways that did not constitute securities contracts, XRP itself not being a security only certain very specific, very specific span of time past structurings of it in sales. The judge did not find these to violate the injunction. They have been selling for years and do not sell to the open market, only to clients who use it, unlike Chainlink Labs which dump on you to literally scam you.
>bridge
Yes it objectively does. Or at least is improved doing so. Uber-liquid bridges have a massive structural and economic advantage over smartcontract swaps, especially if done so between on-chain assets. ILP makes XRP interoperable with any even conceivable blockchain or tradfi network. Hundreds of times cheaper and faster than using CCIP for payments, not exaggeration or giving a turn of phrase, literally hundreds.