>>28605513
The study is locked to the public so there's nothing I can say about it.
The thing about this is that there are so many factors and if you exclude just one or two details the numbers can be skewed heavily in either direction.
How did they come to the conclusion shown in your pic (post x5510) that US ICE cars emit 5x more during "use?" EVs are heavier and most electricity is made from burning fossil fuels. What assumptions did they make? Did they have some formula where "X amount of gasoline equals Y amount of emissions?"
I'll never know because they won't let me read the study.
Has anyone considered banning server farms, airplanes, cargo ships, beef, etc? Look at picrel, that 15% slice includes planes, ships and trains (ships and planes don't have emissions controls like cars do btw), why does everyone only focus on cars? Obesity causes a large amount of pollution through agriculture and food cooling/transport, why don't we quantify that? Overpopulation increases emissions from everything. Cruise ships serve zero purpose yet guzzle upwards of 100,000 gallons a day. Why are cars always the focus?