>>107127250
Attached image is from Brave themselves. I think Firefox have said something similar re: Flatpak.
The reason I'm asking is because there's some people who say that giving the browser "deeper access" is a security risk in and of itself.

Here's what someone recently said here on /g/ about this (from desuarchive): "The non-Flatpak versions of web browsers directly access your kernel to spawn processes, which itself can be dangerous. So with a non-Flatpak browser you're just replacing one 'sandbox' workaround with another, while having an inherently less isolated and secure application overall."