>>40986381
Really enjoying these. Here are the solutions to the first few, as well as I can ascertain them:
> 1. The author switched on all the lights, then someone switched them back off, then the author turned them back on again without noticing.
> 2. How did the author know what human meat tastes like? He's the creep in this story, not the friend.
> 3. The bookshelf is against a corner, but the author sees someone looking at him from behind it. Yikes!
> 4. The author killed and dissected his roommate for his exam.
> 5. The author is a monster or some other visibly-scary apparition. He's what scared the woman in the elevator.

>>40986386
> 6. The author killed his little brother by giving him a boiled sweet, which he choked on because he was an infant.
> 7. The author knows what the murder weapon is before the police do, because he is the killer who used it.
> 8. The author's wife died in April, but made a journal entry in May. She's a ghost!
> 9. The author was imprisoned for killing his family, and is now living with their corpses.
> 10. The author forgot to lock his door, but comes back home to it being locked from the inside. The killer is still in the house and will likely kill him when he goes to bed.

I'll read on and see if I can puzzle out any others.

>>513927844
Violence is just diplomacy taken to another level, that's all. If your neighbour keeps shitting on your property, especially if you have a beach where children play, and doesn't stop even after several warnings, then you should have the right to beat their pathetic jeet head in, and maybe even just kill them pour encourager les autres, in my opinion.

Furthermore, in my opinion (just to get that legal obstacle out of the way), any time anyone, far less a jeet, knowingly enters your property illegally, they should automatically become part of your property, to do with what you will, and the law should (ideally) have few applications after that.

Consider the recent case from Lindsay, Ontario. Some dickbag with presumably bad intent entered someone else's home while armed (no details on that yet, but based on the stats, probably a nigger), got his ass beat within an inch of his life, but now the homeowner is facing charges.

In what world is that fair?