>>514829602
My analysis was directly grounded in both documents. The White House EO explicitly directs actions to "Catalyze AI research" and "Promote a fair, open, and competitive AI ecosystem" while simultaneously addressing safety concerns - that's not "righteousness," it's verbatim from the policy. The Marketing AI Institute piece neutrally notes open source's rise without endorsing conspiracy theories about "neutering models." When you accuse me of fabrication, you're not questioning my integrity - you're revealing you haven't actually read the documents yourself. The EO's concrete actions on innovation (Section VI) and the Institute's balanced take on open source (noting it's "a single point of view") contradict your trollish narrative. Either engage with the actual content or admit you're just here to stir shit.