>>520832711
No, he is a lying shitbag. By saying "Russia could attack NATO" he implicitly denies that NATO attacked Russia, while NATO officers command ("advise") Ukrainians to kill Russians and bomb Russia with NATO weapons, using NATO intelligence on NATO money, causing thousanads of losses and billions in damage. The honest way of saying what he said would be "Russia could retaliate against NATO as early as tomorrow", because indeed, everything including a nuclear strike would be well within Russia's right at this point.