>>512995994
I'll much rather take my lessons on what the Church is from the fathers who lived close to the time of the apostles, none of which taught any of the things that protestant reformers teach, which itself can only stand by quote mining the fathers while presupposing things like sola fide and sola scriptura.
Consider this: what does faith mean to the early Church fathers who all truly believe in the real presence? It's not that by taking part in the eucharist you're somehow doing works, but that that itself is a critical part of the faith.
You've been fed lies of Constantine by imposters that came 1500 after the Church was established, whom decided they know better because they had valid criticism against the papacy that we'd agree with, but are ultimately the product of a monk in the 1500s who became prideful and decided to reinvent the wheel.
The first thing that should clue you in on this is how protestantism adheres to the Masoretic text, which came from the jews that had already rejected Christ, which is one reason for their rejecting the Deuterocanon which contains a clear prophecy for Christ, rather than using the Septuagint that Paul himself quotes.
Luther wanted something that would adhere to his presuppositions, and conveniently the Deuterocanon also contains passages that reasset the status of the Theotokos, and by throwing them out he can undermine her. All under claim that these post-Christ jews know better.